Microsoft marketing funding, used properly

Microsoft offers partners access to a range of marketing funding programmes designed to support growth.
From demand generation to market development, the intent is clear: help partners build visibility, generate opportunities and accelerate momentum.
The challenge is not whether funding exists. It’s knowing how to use it in a way that actually delivers value, both commercially and in the eyes of Microsoft.
The main Microsoft marketing funding channels
Click each of the headings below to learn more.
Marketing development funds (MDF)
Marketplace and incentive linked funding
No integrations match your search.
What Microsoft expects in return
Marketing funding is not designed to subsidise activity for its own sake. Microsoft expects funded activity to be relevant to the audience, aligned to Microsoft priorities, delivered to a reasonable standard and supported by clear proof that the activity took place
This is where many partners feel pressure. Not because the rules are impossible, but because the activity itself has not been properly thought through.
When campaigns are clear, joined up, and audience-led, compliance tends to follow naturally.

Common mistakes partners make with funded marketing
Treating funding as something to “use up” rather than invest properly.
Planning activity around what is claimable instead of what will perform.
Rushing to deliver campaigns at the end of a funding window (half).
Running disconnected tactics with no clear message or objective.
Producing activity that qualifies but delivers little commercial impact.
A more effective way to approach funded campaigns
Funded marketing works best when it is treated like any other serious campaign. The funding supports the plan, not the other way around.
Start with the outcome, not the funding
The strongest funded campaigns begin with a clear answer to three questions:
-
Who are we trying to reach?
-
What do we want them to understand or do?
-
How does this support the wider business goal?
Once that is clear, funding becomes a way to support delivery rather than dictate direction.


Build campaigns that stand up commercially
Activity should make sense even without funding attached. That means:
-
Messaging that is relevant and specific
-
Content that reflects real buyer needs
-
Campaigns that build momentum rather than create noise
-
Channels chosen for impact, not convenience
Funding should amplify good thinking, not compensate for its absence.
Where Resultful fits
We work with Microsoft partners who want funded activity to do more than tick a box.
Our role is not to manage claims or administer funding. Instead, we support partners with the thinking, planning and delivery that sits around funded marketing activity.
That can include campaign strategy and planning, proposition and messaging development, demand generation campaigns, content and asset creation or performance review and refinement.
The aim is simple. Help partners make better use of the opportunities in front of them and deliver activity that works in the real world.
Thinking about using Microsoft marketing funding?
Thinking about using Microsoft marketing funding?
If you are looking to plan funded marketing activities that deliver genuine value, rather than rushed execution, let's talk.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Co‑op and MDF?
Co‑op is typically earned through incentive programmes and used flexibly across eligible activities. MDF is usually allocated in advance for specific initiatives or priorities.
Can agencies be used for funded marketing activity?
In many cases, yes. Marketing agencies are commonly used to plan and deliver eligible activities, provided they align with program guidelines.
Is funded marketing suitable for always‑on activity?
It can be, but only when it links clearly to Microsoft's key aims and is used to fund activities aligned to them. The use of funds for non-Microsoft marketing activities are generally not allowed.
What happens if the funded activity does not perform well?
Poor performance is usually a symptom of weak planning or unclear objectives. Focusing on relevance and intent upfront significantly improves outcomes.
You are less likely to be assessed on results with Co-op funding, whereas marketing development funds are assessed much more closely, and future requests may be rejected if you've previously been unable to deliver or evidence a return.

